Metadiscourse and coherence in interpreting
Tipo de material: Recurso continuoIdioma: Chino Series ; vol.63n.6Detalles de publicación: Amsterdam : Jhon BenjaminsFédération Internationale des Traducteurs , november-december 2017Descripción: p. 846-860ISSN:- 0521-9744
Tipo de ítem | Biblioteca actual | Colección | Signatura topográfica | Estado | Fecha de vencimiento | Código de barras | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Artículos/Analíticas | Biblioteca Bartolomé Mitre | Colección General | H17 (Navegar estantería(Abre debajo)) | Disponible |
This paper aims to look closely at the achievement of coherence in interpreting through the prism of metadiscourse, a set of grammatical resources instrumental in organizing a discourse, guiding the recipients towards an author/speaker's preferred interpretation while taking account of their needs and expectation. Despite a general consensus on the role of the umbrella term, opinions vary on what falls under it. Further, while the conception sets an illuminating framework for empirical endeavors to delve into the way in which meaning is negotiated and represented at discoursal level, its discussion is often confined to the analysis of written text in specific genre (e.g. academic treatise), leaving its role in oral discourse scarcely explored. In this paper, we propose an adapted taxonomy for the analysis of devices as such in interpretation and relate them to the building of coherence in interpreted events. Qualitative analysis of instances from real-life situations is then presented to show that successful communication in interpreting does not only come as a result of rendering the propositional message, but also involves a process of skillfully managing various metadiscoursal devices in reconstructing intertextual and intratextual conherences, both of which serve the same communicative goal with neither enjoying precedence over the other. The proposed taxonomy of metadiscourse may have some pedagogical and practical implications.
No hay comentarios en este titulo.