Su búsqueda retornó 2 resultados.

Resumen: Desde la época en la que los estudios de la traducción hicieron aparición, hace sesenta años, en las universidades, estos vienen padeciendo un ahistoricismo endémico. De ello tienen culpa, en parte, tanto docentes como profesionales de la traducción que piensan que la historia de la disciplina es una cuestión subordinada tanto en la docencia como en el ejercicio de la misma. Cierto es que paulatinamente este historicismo se va paliando y en la actualidad, cuando gracias al esfuerzo de muchos investigadores vamos disponiendo de un respetable corpus de historia de la traducción, es necesario destacar y evaluar las diferentes corrientes que se van perfilando en el ejercicio de la misma.

Resumen: The creative turn in translation studies has led to a reconsideration of translation and of the relationship between translators and writers. Many popular writers have been also translators and their works have been attentively analyzed to argue the relationship between translation and authorship. It is the case of Foscolo, well known as poet and writer and, due to his fame, also known as the translator of Sterne's Sentimental Journey. Foscolo was already an author when he translated Sterne and his difficult relationship with his new role is well documented by letters and writings. In particular Foscolo could not stand the fact of being considered not the author of his text, but just a "translator" and finally he resolved to create a new character, Didimo Chierico, which in his opinion authorized him to be mentioned as co-author. Foscolo's translation is considered a "classic" in Italy and for this reason Italian students read his translation notwithstanding the fact it is two centuries old. There are translations which manage to be considered an original literary work and as an original stand in the literary system; Foscolo's Viaggio sentimentale is a case in point. As an original, it does not suffer from aging and exerts its influence over other translations.