Su búsqueda retornó 3 resultados.

Resumen: This paper is an attempt to investigate the current problems the students graduating in English at the ISLT are likely to encounter when setting out to render English into Arabic. My teaching experience with them was beneficial, albeit quite short (one year-long only, 2000-2001). The material gathered, on the other hand, was wide-ranging and, better still, so provocative that I readily agreed to venture onto dangerous ground.[2] Studies in the past have often failed to delve deep into possible meanings and extend beyond traditional boundaries so as to assess the scope of words and explore the meaning potentials. Recent advances in the literature argue that translators should be sensitive to the losses and gains of cultural elements and assess the “weight” of these elements in the source text in order to bring about the same/similar effects. It is true that loss of meaning is inevitable and the transference to the translator’s language can only be approximate (Newmark 1988, 7). The current trend in translation theory is to explore situations to make it possible to transcend linguistic as well as cultural barriers. Translators will continue to reproduce only restricted facets of meaning so long as they do not vanquish ordinary processes of thought and approach the words in the SL text as units of discourse. I make no pretence at being able to offer definitive solutions. This account aims at identifying the potentially problematic areas in translating English into Arabic. The sense of new in this experience embodies a larger vision, apparently a different quality of recognition since the focal interest is laid on the interpretive weight of words as constituent parts of the act of communication.

Resumen: Sommaire (17 articles) -Stratégies de traduction : les introductions et les conclusions dans des textes de vulgarisation scientifique Joëlle Rey et Mercedes Tricásp. 1–1 -Interjections and Pragmatic Errors in Dubbing Maria Josep Cuencap. 20–35 -On Translatibility from English into Arabic: Words and Beyond Ali Gadachap. 36–50 -Arabic Imperfect Verbs in Translation: A Corpus Study of English Renderings Hassan A. H. Gadallap. 51–71 -Making Translation Testing More Teaching-oriented: A Case Study of Translation Testing in China Defeng Lip. 72–88 -Musicality and Intrafamily Translation: With Reference to European Languages and Chinese Laurence Wongp. 89–97 -Intertextualité et traduction Geneviève Roux-Faucardp. 98–118 -Le chaos de la traduction et la traduction du chaos Pier-Pascale Boulangerp. 119–130 -Academic Writing and Culture: An Overview of Differences between English, French and German Dirk Siepmannp. 131–150 Études terminologiques et linguistiques -Un bestiaire linguistique – ou les animaux dans les images du français et de l’anglais Henri Van Hoofp. 151–159 -Semantic Models for the Translation of Greek Institutional Terms in the Field of Education Eleni Kassapip. 160–165 Bibliographie -La rédaction p. 166–168 Carvalho Homem, R. and T. Hoenselaars (eds.) (2004): Translating Shakespeare for the Twenty-First Century, Amsterdam/New York, Editions Rodopi B.V., viii + 269 p. Kathleen Connorsp. 169–170 Megale, F. (2004) : Diritto d’autore del traduttore, Napoli, Editoriale Scientifica, 282 p. Roberto D’Oraziop. 170–172 Norberg, U. (2003) : Übersetzen mit doppeltem Skopos, Eine empirische Prozess- und Produktstudie, Uppsela Universitet, 222 p. Roger Goffinp. 172–173 -Kothari, R. (2003): Translating India, Manchester, St. Jerome Publishing, v + 138 p. Xu Jianzhongp. 173–174 -Sucessful strategies in drama translation: Yasmina Reza’s “Art” Marta Mateop. 175–183

Resumen: This paper proposes a model for translating Standard Arabic imperfect verbs into English based on their contextual references. It starts with a brief introduction to tense and aspect in English and Arabic. Then, it shows the study aim and technique. After that, it provides an analysis of the study results by discussing the various translations of Arabic imperfect verbs in the translations of two novels written by Naguib Mahfouz. The study compares the translations with the original texts to highlight the different English renderings of the Arabic imperfect verbs.